[2026:RJ-JP:3111] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 69/2026 1. Priyanka Kumari D/o Sh. Nahar Singh, W/o Sh. Rajendra, Aged About 18 Years, R/o Village Bajahera District Bharatpur (Raj.) At Present R/o Village Dunawal, District Bharatpur (Raj.) 2. Rajendra S/o Sh. Manohar, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Village Dunawal, District Bharatpur (Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of Home Affairs Govt. Secretariat Jaipur. (Raj.) 2. Director General Of Police, Police Head Quarter, Lal Kothi, Jaipur. (Raj.) 3. The Nodal Officer, Deeg District Deeg Special Investigation Unit Crime Against Women Cell, Deeg. (Raj.) 4. Superintendent Of Police, Deeg District Deeg (Raj.) 5. The Station House Officer Police Station, Nagar, District Deeg (Raj). 6. The Station House Officer Police Station, Kaman, District Deeg (Raj). 7. The Circle Officer, Nagar, District Deeg (Raj). 8. Nahar Singh, R/o Village Bajahera District Bharatpur (Raj.) 9. Umesh S/o Nahar Singh, R/o Village Bajahera District Bharatpur (Raj.) 10. Rakesh S/o Nahar Singh, R/o Village Bajahera District Bharatpur (Raj.) 11. Harkesh S/o Kishan, R/o Village Pirpara, District Deeg. 12. Shivsingh S/o Kishan, R/o Village Pirpara, District Deeg. 13. Harveer S/o Pyare Lal, R/o Bajahera, District Deeg. 14. Mahesh S/o Pyare Lal, R/o Bajahera, District Deeg. 15. Vishnu S/o Pyare Lal, R/o Bajahera, District Deeg. 16. Narayan Singh S/o Dharmi, R/o Village Dundawal, District Deeg. [2026:RJ-JP:3111] (2 of 3) [CRLW-69/2026] 17. Ghanshyam Singh, R/o Village Lomri, District Deeg. 18. Sharwan, R/o Village Lomri, District Deeg. 19. Virpal, R/o Mundauti, District Deeg. 20. Sheetal, R/o Village Bajahera, District Deeg. 21. Girdhar, R/o Village Mundauti, District Deeg. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Surendra Singh Mr. Anoop Kumar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 22/01/2026 1. Defects pointed out by the Registry are overruled. 2. Petitioners are major and present in person. They have duly been identified by their counsel. 3. This criminal writ petition has been filed by petitioners seeking protection from the private respondent Nos.8 to 21 as they are apprehending danger to their life and liberty at the hands of private respondents. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the petitioners are mature enough to take decision of their life. It is submitted that petitioners have entered into marriage as per Hindu Rites and Customs at Arya Samaj Mandir (Trust), Gokhle Market, Tis Hazari Court, Delhi on 19.12.2025 and same has been registered on 24.12.2025. The certificate of registration of marriage of the petitioners is annexed with this petition. Counsel further submits that petitioners are living peacefully as husband [2026:RJ-JP:3111] (3 of 3) [CRLW-69/2026] and wife but respondent Nos.8 to 21 are not happy with their marriage and petitioners are receiving continuous threats from the private respondents, so they prayed for protection. 5. In view of the above factual averments, petitioners are directed to file appropriate application seeking protection before respondent No.5-Station House Officer, Police Station, Nagar, District Deeg (Raj) and respondent no.5 is directed to provide protection to the petitioners, if any application is filed before him and he would ensure that no harm is caused to the petitioners. 6. The criminal writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. 7. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. 8. However, it is made clear that this order will not affect the civil/ criminal proceedings, if any, in the present matter. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /260