Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15686 (ALL)

KAPIL KUMAR @ KALLU v. STATE OF U.P.

NABAIL/7278/2026 · 2026-10-06

Vivek Kumar Singh

Public Interest Litigationbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 7278 of 2026 Court No. - 71 HON'BLE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH, J. 1. The present application has been filed on behalf of the applicant in Case Crime No. 228 of 2025, under Sections 87, 127(4), 115(2), 351(3) BNS, Police Station Thanabhawan, District Shamli, with a prayer to grant him anticipatory bail. 2. No one appears on behalf of the applicant to press this anticipatory bail application even in the revised call though the learned A.G.A. is present. 3. It appears that the matter has become infructuous by efflux of time. Either the applicant has been arrested or apprehension of his arrest no longer survives. 4. Present anticipatory bail application is, therefore, dismissed for want of prosecution. 5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 6. Office to communicate this order to the court concerned within a week. 7. If the cause of action still survives, the applicant may file a fresh anticipatory bail application for reviving the matter on merits. . October 7, 2026 Nitendra Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ravi Prakash Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Vivek Kumar Singh,J.) Kapil Kumar @ Kallu .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- NITENDRA TIWARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad