[2026:RJ-JP:3110] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 123/2026 1. Nirapad Gupta, S/o Shri Jatindra Nath Gupta, Aged About 76 Years, R/o Mb-1/206, Pratap Apartment, Sector-29, Pratap Nagar, Jaipur, Presently Residing At J-206, Mahima Panorama, Ramnagariya, Jagatpura, Jaipur-302017. 2. Debmita Gupta D/o Nirapad Gupta, W/o Kundan Kumar, Aged About 46 Years, R/o J-206, Mahima Panorama, Ramnagariya, Jagatpura, Jaipur-302017. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor 2. The Superintendent Of Police, Jaipur District, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 3. The Nodal Officer, Police Office, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. 4. The Station House Officer, Police Station Jagatpura, Jaipur, Rajasthan 5. Bijoli Gupta, W/o Nirapad Gupta, Presently R/o Cm Shikshak And Prahari Apartment, Near Pratap Nagar Police Station, Pratap Nagar, Jaipur. 6. Rupam Gupta, S/o Nirapad Gupta, Presently R/o Cm Shikshak And Prahari Apartment, Near Pratap Nagar Police Station, Pratap Nagar, Jaipur. 7. Madhurita Gupta, W/o Shri Yuvraj Kaginakar, D/o Nirapad Gupta, Presently R/o Cm Shikshak And Prahari Apartment, Near Pratap Nagar Police Station, Pratap Nagar, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Supriya Rana For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 22/01/2026 1. Defects pointed out by the Registry are overruled. 2. This criminal writ petition has been filed by petitioners seeking protection from the private respondent Nos.5 to 7 as they are apprehending danger to their life and liberty at the hands of private respondents. [2026:RJ-JP:3110] (2 of 2) [CRLW-123/2026] 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner No.1 is a senior citizen, aged about 76 years. It is submitted that respondent Nos.5 to 7 are family members of petitioners and in order to grab property of petitioner No.1, they have brutally assaulted him. It is submitted that presently, petitioner No.1 is residing with petitioner No.2, who is his elder daughter. Learned counsel further submits that petitioners are receiving continuous threats from the private respondents, so they prayed for protection. 4. In view of the above factual averments, petitioners are directed to file appropriate application seeking protection before respondent No.4- Station House Officer, Police Station Jagatpura, Jaipur, Rajasthan and respondent No.4 is directed to provide protection to the petitioners, if any application is filed before him and he would ensure that no harm is caused to the petitioners. 5. The criminal writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. 6. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. 7. However, it is made clear that this order will not affect the civil/ criminal proceedings, if any, in the present matter. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /247