[2026:RJ-JP:2797] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 983/2026 1. Omprakash S/o Gajanand, Aged About 47 Years, Residing Of Balapura (I.L.R. Circle Bamangaon), Tehsil Nainwa, District Bundi (Rajasthan). 2. Babulal @ Ramratan S/o Gajanand, Aged About 52 Years, Residing Of Balapura (I.L.R. Circle Bamangaon), Tehsil Nainwa, District Bundi (Rajasthan). ----Petitioners Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Additional Chief Secre- tary, Department Of Revenue, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secre- tariat, Jaipur. 2. The District Collector, Bundi. 3. The Sub-Divisional Officer Nainwa, District Bundi. 4. The Tehsildar, Tehsil Nainwa, District Bundi. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ravindra Kumar Paliwal For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order 21/01/2026 1. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioners under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, with the following prayers: "A. It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that your Lordship may graciously be pleased to accept and allow the writ petition and by an appropriate writ of mandamus, order or direction in nature thereof: i) The respondents may kindly be directed to initiate immediate ac- tion to remove encroachment from government pasture land bear- ing khasra no.37 rakba 33.0071 hectare situated at Balapura (I.L.R. Circle Bamangaon). Tehsil Nainwa, District Bundi (Rajasthan) in the light of judgment of Hon'ble High Court delivered in the case of Jagdish Prasad Meena (supra). ii) Any other order which this Hon'ble Court may deems fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case also be passed in favour of humble petitioner along with cost of writ petition." [2026:RJ-JP:2797] (2 of 2) [CW-983/2026] 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners, after arguing the matter at some length, and upon instructions from his clients, submits that the petitioners would be satisfied if; direction may be issued to respondent No.2 - The District Collector, Bundi, to decide the representation (Annexure-4/dated 05.12.2025) in a time-bound manner. 3. Heard and considered the submissions made at bar. 4. In view of the above, the present writ petition is disposed of with direction to respondent No.2 - The District Collector, Bundi, to decide the representation of the petitioner, within a period of twelve (12) weeks from today by passing a speaking order, strictly in accordance with law. 5. It is made clear that the aforesaid direction to decide the representation has been issued only with a view to ensure expeditious redressal of the petitioners' grievance. The same shall not be construed as an order to decide the representation in any particular manner. 6. Furthermore, it is needless to say that after adjudication of the representation, if any cause of action still survives, the petitioners would be at liberty to avail further remedies available under the law. 7. The stay application and other pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of, accordingly. (MANEESH SHARMA),J Seema/52