( 2026:JHHC:16367 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 4198 of 2026 ------ Ramrai Bodra, aged about 35 years, Son of Bishu Bodra, Resident of Village –Ututua, P.O. & P.S. –Chakradharpur, District –West Singhbhum at Chaibasa. … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Gautam Kumar, Advocate : Mr. Birat Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Gautam Rakesh, Addl. P.P. ------ Order No.02 Dated- 08.06.2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with S.T. Case No. 118 of 2025 arising out of Chakradharpur P.S. Case No.139 of 2023 registered for the offences punishable under sections 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons attempted to murder the informant namely Harish Bodra. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 06.02.2025, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 01 of the bail application. It is then submitted that so far three witnesses has been examined including the victim and his brother who have supported the case of the prosecution. It is further submitted that the genesis of the occurrence is a land dispute between the parties. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. on the other hand vehemently opposes the prayer for bail and submits that the keeping in view the direct and specific allegation against the petitioner which has already come in evidence through the P.W.s 1 & 2 and which is supported by the medical evidence that came through the P.W.3, there is every chance of the petitioner absconding, if released on bail. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioners ought not to be admitted to bail. Considering the serious nature of allegation against the petitioner and the evidence that has already come in record against the petitioner, is also the chance of the petitioner absconding if released on bail, this Court is not inclined to admit the petitioners on bail at this stage. Accordingly, the prayer for regular bail of the above-named petitioners is rejected. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 08.06.2026 Sonu/