Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15677 (CHH)

NAUSHAD KHAN v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/456/2026 · 2026-01-15

Shri Parth Prateem Sahu

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:2653 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 456 of 2026 • Naushad Khan S/o Late Shri Haji M. Malik Aged About 59 Years Working As Lecturer (Suspended) Swami Atmananda Utrkisht English Medium School Farid Nagar, Durg, R/o Takiyapara, Durg, District Durg C.G. ... Petitioner versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Director, Directorate Of Public Instruction, Indravati Bhavan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur C.G. 2. Deputy Director, Directorate Of Public Instruction, Indravati Bhavan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur C.G. 3. Secretary, School Education Department, Government Of Chhattisgarh, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur C.G. 4. Upper Secretary, School Education Department, Government Of Chhattisgarh, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur C.G. 5. Divisional Joint Director (Education), Durg Division, District Durg C.G. 6. Deputy Director, Office Of Joint Director, Education Division Durg, District Durg C.G. 7. Collector, Durg, District Durg C.G. 8. District Education Officer, Durg, District Durg C.G. DEEPTI JHA Digitally signed by DEEPTI JHA 2 9. Rudra Narayan Sinha S/o Rameshwar Prasad Sinha Retired Head Master, R/o A- 183, Street No. 31 Shubhkamna,smriti Nagar, Bhilai, Durg, District Durg C.G. ... Respondents (Cause title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Abdul Wahab Khan, Advocate. For State/Respondents : Mr. Suyashdhar Badgaiya, G.A. Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu Order on Board 16/01/2026 1. Heard. 2. On the objection being raised, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to file appropriate application / representation before the higher authorities. 3. Learned State counsel has no objection with regard to the submission made by the counsel for the petitioner. 4. In view of the submission made by the counsel petitioner, the instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty, as prayed for. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Deepti Jha