VIKAS URF GOLU SON OF SHRI DANPAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/826/2026 · 2026-01-19
Ganesh Ram Meena
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15676 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15676 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:2081] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 826/2026 Vikas Urf Golu Son Of Shri Danpal, Aged About 20 Years, Resident Of Village Tumbi Pura, Police Station Uniara, District Tonk ( Rajasthan) ( At Present Confined In Central Jail Tonk) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Paras Jain For Respondent(s) : Ms. Aarti Sharma, P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Order 19/01/2026
1. Petitioner has filed this bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S., arising out of F.I.R. No.247/2025 registered with the Police Station Uniara, District Tonk for offence under Sections 75(2), 77 & 78(2) of B.N.S., 2023.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that co-accused, Vinit Kumar, has already been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 09.01.2026 (S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.177/2026). He further submits that the petitioner is in custody since 04.12.2025 and trial of the case will take considerable time to conclude, therefore, he may be enlarged on bail.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the
[2026:RJ-JP:2081] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-826/2026] bail application.
4. Considered the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor.
5. Taking into consideration the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner, so also the fact that co-accused, Vinit Kumar, has already been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 09.01.2026 (S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.177/2026) and the accused-petitioner is in custody since 04.12.2025, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
6. This bail application is, accordingly, allowed and it is
directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter be transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /12