Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010040272023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 677/2023 Between:
1. SHAIK ISMAIL, ISMAIL S/O, RAHAMTHULLA AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, (TYPED AS SYED ISMAIL IN CC 2663/2022) 19/1/48, JANDA STREET, NELLORE
2. SD.SHAHID, W/O, MD.NAEUAJUR RAHMAN, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, SRI SAI SRINIVASA PALACA APARTMENT, 1ST LINE, PARAMESWARI AVENUE, MULAPET, NELLORE
...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, AMARAVATHI. THROUGH TATION HOUSE OFFICER, DISHA POLICE STATION, NELLORE
2. SYED MIFTHA SHAHREEN, W/O, MUJRRB AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, SULOCHANA TOWERS, MULAPET, NELLORE.
...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Courtmay be pleased to quash the C.0 2663/2022 on the file of Judicail Magistrate of 1st Class, Spl. Mobile Court, Nellore to the extent petitioners and 6 accused and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2023
2
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings including appearance inC.0 2663/2022 on the file of Judicial Magistrate of 1st Class, Spl. Mobile Court to the extent petitioners and 6 accused and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S):
1. AMANCHARLA SATISH BABU Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S):
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)
2. M RAVINDRA The Court made the following:
3
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 677/2023
ORDER:
None represented on behalf of the petitioners.
2. Ms. K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of the State would submit that the relief has become infructuous in this matter since the matter ended in acquittal before the Trial Court and petition may be
disposed of.
3. In that view of the matter, this Criminal Petition is dismissed, since relief has become infructuous.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 05.01.2026. UPS