Page No.# 1/2 GAHC030003002025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : W.P.(Crl.)/2/2025 Sh. Lalmuanawma Mathipi S/o M. Matha Proprietor of M/s Allied Concern Consultancy Firm Dawrpui, Aizawl VERSUS The State of Mizoram and 5 Ors. R/b the Chief Secretary Vigilance Department, Mizoram 2:The Director 3:The Superintendent of Police 4:The Mizoram Lokayukta 5:The State of Mizoram 6:The Directo Advocate for the Petitioner : Ms. Jacinta Zothanmawii Advocate for the Respondent : P.P./Addl.PP, Mizoram for R1 - R3 and R5, R6 Page No.# 2/2 B E F O R E HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE HELEN DAWNGLIANI ORDER 06.10.2026 Ms. Lalngaihsaki Fanai, learned counsel for the petitioner is present along with Mrs. Vanneihsiami, learned Govt. Advocate for respondent Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, & 6, and Mr. C. Lalfakzuala, learned counsel for respondent No. 4. The learned counsel for respondent No. 4 has placed on record a decision of the Hon’ble Apex Court in Radhey Shyam & Anr. Vs Chhabi Nath & Ors. (Civil Appeal No. 2548/2009), wherein the Hon’ble Apex Court held that a challenge to a judicial order, even when a question of fundamental rights is involved can be made only by way of an appeal or revision under Article 227, and not by way of a petition under Articles 226 and 227 (or Article 32) of the Constitution of India. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that she may be allowed to withdraw the instant petition to enable her to approach the appropriate forum. The case stands disposed of as withdrawn. It is needless to mention that the legal rights of the petitioner to pursue an appropriate legal remedy remain open. JUDGE Comparing Assistant