KAJAL RANI & ANOTHER v. VARUN SHARMA, SSP, PATIALA & ANOTHER
COCP/589/2026 · 2026-03-24
Nidhi Gupta
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15670 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15670 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 109 COCP-589-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 24.03.2026 Kajal Rani & anr.
….Pe22oners
Versus Varun Sharma & anr. ....Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present:- Mr. Rakesh Gupta, Advocate for the peoners. Mr. Amaz Singh Sandhu, AAG, Punjab.
NIDHI GUPTA, J.
1. The present contempt peon has been filed alleging violaon of
order dated 09.07.2025 (Annexure P-1) passed by the Writ Court in CRWP- 7333-2025, tled as ‘Kajal Rani and another vs. State of Punjab and others’.
2. At the very outset, It is submi6ed by learned counsel for the peoner that in terms of order dated 09.03.2026, the State has filed reply. He submits that in view of the reply, the present writ peon has been rendered infructuous and may be disposed of as such, as the writ Court order has been complied with.
3. In view of the above, the present peon stands disposed of as infructuous.
4. Rule stands discharged.
5. Pending applicaon(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
(NIDHI GUPTA) 24.03.2026 JUDGE monika i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No MONIKA VERMA 2026.03.25 12:48 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment chandigarh