Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1567 (KAR)

SMT THIMAKKA v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/23830/2025 · 2026-02-23

R Devdas

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11435 WP No. 23830 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 23830 OF 2025 (KLR-LG) BETWEEN: 1. SMT THIMAKKA W/O LATE ARASAIAH, AGED ABOUT 81 YEARS, 2. SRI.BYREGOWDA, S/O LATE ARASAIAH, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, 3. SRI.RAMAKRISHNA, S/O LATE ARASAIAH, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, 4. SRI.MUNIYAPPA, S/O LATE ARASAIAH, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, 5. SRI.DUGLAIAH, S/O LATE ARASAIAH, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, ALL ARE R/AT KITTANAHALLI VILLAGE, DASNAPURA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, BENGALURU-562130 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. CHIDANANDA P., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY Digitally signed by JUANITA THEJESWINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11435 WP No. 23830 of 2025 2. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT KANDHAYA BHAVAN, K.G. ROAD, BENGALURU-560009. 3. CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER BENGALURU URBAN ZILLA PANCHAYAT BENGALURU-560050. 4. TAHSILDAR BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, BENGALURU-560 036. 5. KADABAGERE GRAMA PANCHAYAT KADABAGERE, DASANAPURA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, BENGALURU-562 130 REP. BY ITS PANCHAYAT DEVELOPMENT OFFICER 6. PUTTAMMA W/O MUDDANARSHIMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS 7. LATHA W/o GANGAIAH AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS 8. MAHESH S/O KEMPANNA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS 9. SHOBA W/O BHASKAR AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS 10. MANJULA S/o LATE HARISH AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS 11. LAKSHMI W/O GANGADHAR AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS 12. H. NARSHIMA - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11435 WP No. 23830 of 2025 S/O NARSAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS 13. YALLAMMA S/O MANAPPA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS 14. MANJULA.A.M W/O DINESH AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS 15. MANAMMA W/O HANUMANTHAPPA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS 16. ROOJA D/O KRISHNAMURTHY AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS 17. SUSHILA D/O NANJAPPA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS 18. NAGARTHNAMMA W/O NANJAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS 19. KIRAN S/O KRISHNAMURTHY AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS 20. YASHODHA W/O CHANNABHOVI AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS 21. ANANDA S/O HANUMATHAPPA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, 22. MANJU S/O H.M.NARAYANA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS 23. NAGAMMA - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11435 WP No. 23830 of 2025 W/O NARAYANA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, 24. LAKSHMANA S/O THIMMAPPA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS 25. JAYALAKSHMI W/O LAKSHMANA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, 26. GNANENDRA S/O VENKTESHAPPA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS 27. DINESH S/O NANJAPPA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, 28. BASAVARAJU S/O NANJEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, 29. CHANNAPA S/O CHANNABOVI AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS 30. PUSHPA W/O SATHISHA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS ALL ARE R/AT ASHRAYA NAGARA PEENYA 1ST STAGE BENGALURU – 560 058 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.V.SESHU., HCGP FOR R1, R2 & R4 SRI.MAHESH UPPIN., ADVOCATE FOR R3 SRI. P.H.VIRUPAKSHAIAH., ADVCOATE FOR IMPLEADING RESPONEDEDNTS R5 TO R29) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE IMPUGNED OFFICIAL - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11435 WP No. 23830 of 2025 MEMORANDUM DT 07-05-2024 BEARING() 10/24-25 ISSUED BY RESPONDENT NO. 2 AT ANNEXURE-A AND OFFICIAL MEMORANDUM DT.07-10-2024 BEARING (6) SBM/MSWM/31/2024 25 ISSUED BY THE BENGALURU URBAN ZILLA PANCHAYAT I.E, RESPONDENT NO.3 AT ANNEXURE-B AND ISSUE A WRIT IN NATURE OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT NO.4 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DT 15-3-2024 AT ANNEXURE-H ENTERING THE NAME OF THE PETITIONERS IN REVENUE RECORDS WITH RESPECT TO PROPERTY BEARING SY. NO.80, MEASURING 9 ACRES, SITUATED AT GIDDENAHALLI GRAMA, DASANAPURA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, BENGALURU AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER The present writ petition is filed by the same petitioners in W.P.No.32052/2025 in the matter of usage of the lands for establishing a Solid Waste Management unit at the hands of the respondent-Gram Panchayat and in view of the findings of this Court in respect of the lands in question and the claim of the petitioners being rejected in the said writ petition, the present petition is also disposed of accordingly. - 6 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11435 WP No. 23830 of 2025 In view of the disposal of the writ petition, impleading application in I.A.No.1/2025 does not survive for consideration and accordingly the same stands disposed of. All other pending I.As., also stand disposed of. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE JT/- CT: JL