Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15668 (AP)

MEE SEVA OPERATORS WQELFARE ASSOCIATION v. THE GOVT. OF INDIA

WP/1778/2019 · 2026-02-01

K Sreenivasa Reddy

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010039232019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3327] MONDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 1778/2019 Between: 1. MEE SEVA OPERATORS WQELFARE ASSOCIATION, A.P. (REGD., NO. 74/2012) REP. BY ITS PRESIDENT SRI K.URAGANDHAR, S/O. KANUR, MEE SEVA OPERATOR OFFICE AT DR. NO. 13-231, PORANKI, KRISHNA DISTRICT. A.P. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE GOVT OF INDIA, REP. BY ITS PRL. SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF ELECTRONICS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (MEITY), NEW DELHI, INDIA. 2. UNIQUE IDENTIFICATION AUTHORITY OF INDIA, UIDAI, REP. BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER (CEO) OFFICE AT 3RD FLOOR, TOWER II, JEEVAN BHARATI BUILDING, CANNAUGHT CIRCUS, NEW DELHI. 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR GENERAL, UNIQUE IDENTIFICATION AUTHORITY OF INDIA (UIDAI) REGIONAL OFFICE AT BLOCK NO. 605-612, 6TH FLOOR, SWARAJAYANTHI COMPLEX, AMEERPET, HYDERABAD, T.S. 4. THE STATE OF A P, REP. BY ITS PRL. SECRETARY, DEPT. OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, A.P. SECRETARIAT AT VELAGAPUDI, VIJAYAWADA A.P. 5. THE DIRECTOR, ELECTRONICALLY SERVICES DELIVERABLE, ESD (MEE-SEVA) STATE OF A.P. OFFICE AT 48-9-2/1, VISHNU NAGAR, GUNADALA, VIJAYAWADA. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. BETHI VENKATESWARLU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA 2 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K. SREENIVASA REDDY Writ Petition No.1778 of 2019 Order: There was no representation on behalf of the petitioner on the last three occasions i.e. on 17.12.2025, 21.01.2026 and 28.01.2026. On 28.01.2026 the matter was directed to be listed to today under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Even today, when the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner is not evincing any interest in prosecuting the matter. 2. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. _________________________ K. SREENIVASA REDDY, J. Date:02.02.2026 Asr 3 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K. SREENIVASA REDDY Writ Petition No.1778 of 2019 Date:02.02.2026 Asr