Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15661 (RAJ)

MAHESH S/O SHRI BABULAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/1052/2026 · 2026-01-21

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:2782] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1052/2026 Mahesh S/o Shri Babulal, R/o Village Barsat, P.s. Sarthal, District Baran, Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Chhabra, Baran). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Samarth Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 21/01/2026 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.151/2025 registered at Police Station Sarthal, District-Baran for offences under Sections 8 and 15 of NDPS Act. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The allegation against the petitioner is that he allegedly supplied contraband is 3.155 kg of poppy straw, which is below the commercial quantity. The person from whose conscious possession the contraband was recovered was granted bail by this Court on 29.10.2025. Though one case of a similar nature has [2026:RJ-JP:2782] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-1052/2026] been registered against the petitioner, he has already been granted bail in that matter. Petitioner is behind the bars since 28.11.2025. Charge-sheet has been filed. The trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, hence, the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case, and without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner-Mahesh S/o Shri Babulal shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/ each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for his appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/8