Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15661 (ALL)

AJAY KUMAR PANDEY v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

CRLP/24348/2026 · 2026-10-06

Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing, Tarun Saxena

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 24348 of 2026 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following main prayers:- "1. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the order dated 24.08.2026 passed by respondent No.2/District Magistrate, Mau in Case No. 2290/ 2025 (State Versus Ajay Kumar (Computerized Pandey) Case No.D202515510002290. II. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent authority not to interfere in peaceful life of the petitioner." 2. After some length of arguments, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner made an innocuous prayer that he may be permitted to withdraw the instant writ petition with liberty to avail the appropriate remedy available under the law as advised. 3. Learned AGA appearing on behalf of the State-respondents vehemently opposed the instant writ petition but has no objection on innocuous prayer made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. 4. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner as well as learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State-respondents and perused the material available on record. 5. Since, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has not pressed the instant writ petition on merits, only made innocuous prayer to Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Akhilanand Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Ajay Kumar Pandey .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) avail appropriate alternative remedy as advised, we are inclined to allow the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed. 7. Office is directed to return the certified copy of the required documents to the counsel for petitioner after retaining photocopy of the same as per High Court Rules. October 7, 2026 Atul CRLP No. 24348 of 2026 2 (Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ATUL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad