ANIL VISHWAKARMA @ ANIL MISTRY v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./4887/2026 · 2026-06-04
Rongon Mukhopadhyay
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15657 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15657 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:16139 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B. A. No. 4887 of 2026
---
1. Anil Vishwakarma @ Anil Mistry
2. Dharmendar Vishwakarma @ Dharmendar Kumar Vishwakarma
… … Petitioner(s)
Versus The State of Jharkhand
… … Opposite Party(s)
---
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY
---
For the Petitioner(s)
: Mr. Shree Niwas Roy, Advocate
For the Opposite Party(s) : A.P.P.
---
2/04.06.2026 Heard Mr. Shree Niwas Roy, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioners are an accused in connection with Tisri P.S. Case No. 27 of 2026.
The informant and others were assaulted by the accused persons including the petitioners.
Submission has been advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the incident had occurred on account of a land dispute. It has been submitted that the allegations are in general and omnibus in nature and the petitioners are in custody since 23.03.2026.
Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
Regard being had to the above, the petitioners above named are
directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned J.M.F.C., Giridih in connection with Tisri P.S. Case No. 27 of 2026.
(Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J) 04.06.2026 Suman/ Nandini/-