IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Ex. Petition No. 557 of 2026 Decided on: 14.07.2026 Sushil Kumar …Petitioner. Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation and others … Respondents. …………………………………………………………………………………… Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner. : Mr. Manohar Lal Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents. : Mr. Deepak Sharma, Advocate. Jiya Lal Bhardwaj , Judge (Oral) Learned counsel for the respondents has produced a communication dated 16.06.2026, issued by Regional Manager, HRTC, Nagrota Bagwan, which is taken on record. 2. A perusal of the communication reveals that the petitioner has been paid DCRG and leave encashment of Rs. 9,68,085/- and Rs. 7,17,100/-, respectively. The interest on the amount of DCRG and leave encashment i.e. amounting to 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 Rs. 59,236/- and Rs. 47,101/-, respectively has also been paid to the petitioner. 3. Since the mandate contained in the judgment dated 27.08.2025 passed in CWP No. 13518 of 2025, titled Sushil Kumar Vs. HRTC and others has been duly complied with, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present petition and the same is accordingly disposed of, as having been fully satisfied. 4 Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (Jiya Lal Bhardwaj) Judge 14th July, 2026 (Guleria)