[2026:RJ-JP:2092] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 827/2026 1. Rahul S/o Kailash, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Nayawasi Ki Dhani, Tan Reta, P.s. Sikandra, District Dausa (Raj.). (At Present Confined In District Jail Dausa). 2. Rinkesh @ Tarachand S/o Surgyan, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Nayawasi Ki Dhani, Tan Reta, P.s. Sikandra, District Dausa (Raj.). (At Present Confined In District Jail Dausa). 3. Rambhajan S/o Ramswaroop, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Nayawasi Ki Dhani, Tan Reta, P.s. Sikandra, District Dausa (Raj.). (At Present Confined In District Jail Dausa). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ramswaroop Meena For Respondent(s) : Ms. Aarti Sharma, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 19/01/2026 1. The petitioners have filed this bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S., arising out of F.I.R. No.499/2025 registered with the Police Station Sikandra, District Dausa for offence under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2), 332(c), 351(2) & 303(2) of B.N.S., 2023. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the alleged incident has taken place all of a sudden in between the parties because of some old dispute. He further submits that no one from the accused side has used any kind of sharp and deadly weapon. It is also submitted that there are cross cases in between [2026:RJ-JP:2092] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-827/2026] the parties and the accused-petitioners are in custody since 15.12.2025. He also submits that two of the co-accused namely; Ramesh & Rajendra have already been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 09.01.2026 (S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.155/2026) and trial of the case will take its own time to conclude, therefore, the accused-petitioners may be enlarged on bail. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application and submits that one of the injured, Ghamman, has sustained two injuries, out of which one is on forehead and the other one is on hand. 4. Considered the submissions made by counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor. 5. On perusal of the case diary, it is revealed that all the injuries sustained by the complainant party are by blunt weapon and no any sharp weapon has alleged to have been used by the accused party. 6. Having regard to the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners and taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the petitioners on bail. 7. This bail application is, accordingly, allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners shall be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of [2026:RJ-JP:2092] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-827/2026] Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter be transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /13