Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15652 (RAJ)

SANIYA SUMAN D/O SHRI MOTI LAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLW/122/2026 · 2026-01-28

Anil Kumar Upman

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:3959] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 122/2026 1. Saniya Suman D/o Shri Moti Lal, Aged About 18 Years, R/o Ward No. 40, Hanuvantkhera, Tehsil Ladpura, District Kota Raj. 2. Sonu Kumar Suman S/o Shri Bhanwar Lal Suman, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Ward No. 13 Joshiyon Ka Khera, Village Kapren, Bundi, Raj. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary Home Department, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. Director, General Of Police, Police Headquarter, Lal Kothi, Tonk Road, Jaipur. 3. The Superintendent Of Police, Distt. Kota, Rajasthan. 4. The Superintendent Of Police, Distt. Bundi, Rajasthan 5. The SHO, Police Station Borkhera, Distt. Kota, Rajasthan 6. The SHO, Police Station Kapren, Distt. Bundi, Rajasthan 7. Moti Lal, R/o Ward No. 40, Hanuvantkhera, Tehsil Ladpura, District Kota Raj. 8. Pinki Bai W/o Moti Lal, R/o Ward No. 40, Hanuvantkhera, Tehsil Ladpura, District Kota Raj. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sudhir Gupta, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 28/01/2026 1. Defects pointed out by the Registry are overruled. 2. Petitioners are major and present in person. They have duly been identified by their counsel. [2026:RJ-JP:3959] (2 of 2) [CRLW-122/2026] 3. This criminal writ petition has been filed by petitioners seeking protection from the private respondents No.7 to 8 as they are apprehending danger to their life and liberty at the hands of private respondents. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are major and they are mature enough to take decision of their life. It is submitted that the petitioners are living in a live-in-relationship and in this regard, an agreement dated 02.01.2026 has also been executed between them, which has been annexed with this petition. Learned counsel further submits that petitioners are receiving continuous threats from the private respondents, so they prayed for protection. 5. In view of the above factual averments, petitioners are directed to file appropriate application seeking protection before respondent No.6-Station House Officer, Police Station Kapren, District Bundi (Raj.) and respondent No.6 is directed to provide protection to the petitioners, if any application is filed before him and he would ensure that no harm is caused to the petitioners. 6. The criminal writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. 7. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. 8. However, it is made clear that this order will not affect the civil/ criminal proceedings, if any, in the present matter. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J MADAN/383