9-FA-313-2006.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO.313 OF 2006 Shri.Chandrakant Namdeo Dhale ...Appellant V/s. Sau Laxmibai Chandrakant Jadhav and Ors. ...Respondents ***** No one is present:- On behalf of the Appellant. Mr.Devendranath S. Joshi:- Advocate for Respondent No.3 – New India Assurance Co. Ltd. ***** CORAM : S. M. MODAK, J. DATE : 6th OCTOBER 2026 P. C. :- 1. Heard learned Advocate Shri.Joshi for Respondent No.3. 2. The Tribunal as per the Award dated 30th August 2005 has allowed the Claim. This Appeal is by the Original Respondent No.1 – Insured. A notice was issued to the Appellant because the learned Advocate for the Appellant Shri.M.A.Utgikar has expired. There is Bailiff Report that the Appellant is not residing at given address. Probably, the Insurance Company must have deposited the amount. 3. It seems that the Appellant has lost interest in prosecuting the Appeal. Hence, it is dismissed for non–prosecution. Satish Sangar 1/2 SATISH RAMCHANDRA SANGAR Digitally signed by SATISH RAMCHANDRA SANGAR Date: 2026.10.07 19:13:59 +0530 9-FA-313-2006.doc 4. If an Application is made for restoration, it will be considered on merits. [S. M. MODAK, J.] Satish Sangar 2/2