Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15647 (GAU)

SMTI. NGUKALI v. THE STATE OF NAGALAND AND 4 ORS

WP(C)/101/2026 · 2026-10-05

N Unni Krishnan Nair

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC020004682026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) KOHIMA BENCH Case No. : WP(C)/101/2026 SMTI. NGUKALI W/O SHRI KAKUTO SEMA, PERMANENT RESIDENT OF MISHILIMI VILLAGE, PUGHOBOTO SUB DIVISION, ZUNHEBOTO, NAGALAND VERSUS THE STATE OF NAGALAND AND 4 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY, GOVT. OF NAGALAND, DEPARTMENT OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION, NAGALAND, KOHIMA. 2:THE DIRECTOR DIRECTORATE OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION NAGALAND KOHIMA 3:THE SDO (SC) PUGHOBOTO NAGALAND 4:THE COMMISSIONER NAGALAND KOHIMA 5:THE ADDITIONAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER PUGHOBOTO NAGALAN Advocate for the Petitioner : JOSHUA SHEQI, A HUKAVI SUMI,RUBICA KIHO,TUNATO YEPTHO,KIVITOLI SWU,YEKA SUMI,KEVI KIRE,R WONCHIBENI TSANGLO,K LILY SWU,KEDI KOSO,P MHONBENI EZUNG,MIKA H AYE,CHINGMEI KONYAK,NAGALI SHOHE Advocate for the Respondent : GOVT ADV NL, Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR ORDER Date : 06.10.2026 Mr. C. Konyak, learned counsel, appearing for the petitioner, desires not to press the present writ petition in its present form, in view of certain subsequent developments taking place in the matter. Accordingly, he prays that he be permitted to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to re-file, if the occasion so demands. Prayer is not objected to by Ms. Pichano, learned Government Advocate, appearing for the respondents. In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition stands dismissed on withdrawal, with liberty as prayed for. Sd/- JUDGE Comparing Assistant