Navin Yadav @ Navin Kumar Yadav v. The State of Bihar
CR. MISC./532/2026 · 2026-05-13
Prabhat Kumar Singh
Public Interest Litigationbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15644 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15644 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.532 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-104 Year-2025 Thana- BENIPATTI District- Madhubani ====================================================== Navin Yadav @ Navin Kumar Yadav Son of Kapil Yadav @ Kapildev Yadav R/o Village - Balsa, P.S. - Charaut, Dist. - Sitamarhi. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 2323 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-104 Year-2025 Thana- BENIPATTI District- Madhubani ====================================================== Uday Yadav @ Bauwaji S/o Sanjay Yadav Resident of Mohalla/ Vill.- Agropatti, P.S.- Benipatti, Dist.- Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
(In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 532 of 2026) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Murari Narain Chaudhary, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Pushpa Sinha, APP (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 2323 of 2026) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kedar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Satya Nand Shukla, APP ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 4 13-05-2026 Both the cases arise out of Benipatti P.S. Case No. 104 of 2025 and are being heard and disposed of by common
order.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.
3. Petitioners seek bail in a case registered for the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.532 of 2026(4) dt.13-05-2026 2/3 offence punishable under sections 103 (1) and 3(5) of BNS.
4. As per F.I.R. on 26.04.2025 at 04:00 Pm, husband of informant had gone with co-accused Uday Yadav . At around 09:00 PM, her maternal uncle Sanjay Yadav informed her fahter Kapil Yadav over the phone that accused persons including these petitioner brutally assaulted her husband in his presence . Upon such information, informant along with co-villagers and relatives searched for her husband and found dead body of her husband lying on the east side of the road at Dhobighat Makiya crematorium.
5. On perusal of record and paragraph-12 of case diary, it appears that during investigation, one of the witnesses, namely, Jamun Sahni was examined who claims to be an eye witness to the alleged occurrence who categorically stated that these petitioners along with other accused persons brutally assaulted husband of informant and killed him.
6. Considering the fact that these petitioners appear to be assailants of deceased, materials available on record and other circumstances of case, prayer for regular bail of the petitioners is rejected. However, since petitioners are in custody since 28.04.2025 and 18.07.2025 , learned Trial Court is directed to expedite and conclude the trial, within the period
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.532 of 2026(4) dt.13-05-2026 3/3 of one year from the date of receipt/production of copy of this
order
Koushik/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T