MD. ALI YASIN ALIAS SUJAL v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./4966/2026 · 2026-06-04
Rongon Mukhopadhyay
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15644 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15644 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:16124
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.4966 of 2026 ---- Md. Ali Yasin @ Sujal
…. …. Petitioner(s) Versus
The State of Jharkhand
…. …. Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY ----
For the Petitioner(s)
: Mr. Rahul Ranjan, Adv.
For the State
: Mr. Sashi Kr. Verma, A.P.P. ----
02/Dated: 04th June, 2026
1. Heard Mr. Rahul Ranjan, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP.
2. The petitioner is an accused in connection with Azadngar P.S. Case No.17 of 2026, pending in the court of the learned Special Judge, POCSO, Jamshedpur in Special POCSO No.16 of 2026.
3. The petitioner is alleged to have enticed away the daughter of the informant. The 183 BNSS statement made by the victim reveals that the petitioner has sexually assaulted her. The victim is aged 16 years.
4. Although it has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that there was a love affair between the petitioner and the victim and he is in custody since 05.03.2026, but regard being had to the 183 BNSS statement of the victim and the age of the victim, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, at this stage. Accordingly, the present bail application is hereby rejected.
(Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J.) Dated: 04th June, 2026 Amar/- Uploaded on 06.06.2026