[2026:RJ-JP:2078] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 808/2026 Mohammed Mev S/o Shri Ummed Khan, Aged About 65 Years, R/o Fakarpur, Khohari, Police Station Neegna, District Nooh Mewat (Haryana) (Presently Confined In District Jail, Alwar). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashvendra Singh Rathore for Mr. D.K. Garg For Respondent(s) : Ms. Aarti Sharma, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 19/01/2026 1. Petitioner has filed this bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S., arising out of F.I.R. No.0324/2025 registered with the Police Station Bagad Tiraya, District Alwar for offence under Sections 140(2) & 140(3) of B.N.S., 2023. 2. Heard. 3. Considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused-petitioner as well as the learned Public Prosecutor. 4. The allegations against the accused-petitioner is of demand of ransom for releasing the brother of the complainant. There is no actual transaction of money as ransom in this case. Co-accused namely: Jakir Hussain has already been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 09.01.2026(S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.179/2026) and the accused-petitioner is said [2026:RJ-JP:2078] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-808/2026] to be in custody since 14.11.2025. 5. Having regard to the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused-petitioner and taking into consideration the allegation against the accused-petitioner, who is in custody since 14.11.2025 and more particularly the fact that co-accused namely: Jakir Hussain has already been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 09.01.2026 (S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.179/2026), this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 6. This bail application is, accordingly, allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter be transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /10