Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15640 (RAJ)

HEMRAJ SUMAN S/O DHANNALAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/816/2026 · 2026-01-19

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:2317] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal 3rd Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 816/2026 Hemraj Suman S/o Dhannalal, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Babu Kirana Store Ke Samne, Raipura, Police Station Udyog Nagar, Kota. At Present Ganesh Residency, Rajnagar, Police Station Borkheda, Kota. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Kota). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gajveer Singh Rajawat For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 19/01/2026 1. The present bail application under Section 483 of BNSS is filed by the applicant-accused Hemraj Suman S/o Dhannalal seeking bail in respect of a criminal case registered as FIR No.669/2024 dated 11.12.2024 registered at P.S. Udhyag Nagar (Kota City) District – Kota City, for the offence under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) and 61(2)(a) of BNS, 2023. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the matter and the investigation against him is complete and he is no more required in investigation. He further submits that there are no chance of fleeing of applicant accused from the jurisdiction of this Hon’ble Court. He also submits that the [2026:RJ-JP:2317] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-816/2026] applicant undertakes not to repeat offence and cooperate with trial, which will take time. 3. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that after dismissal of first bail application, co-accused were already enlarged on ail and offence is triable by Magistrate First Class. He also submitted that the matter is a civil dispute and to be decided by civil court. 4. Aforesaid contentions were opposed by learned Public Prosecutor. 5. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record. 6. The first bail application of present petitioner was dismissed by this Court on 29.08.2025 but this Court has allowed bail application of Laturlal, who was 72 years old person. Second bail application was dismissed on 18.11.2025. A co-ordinate Bench of this Court has allowed bail application of Mahaveer Prasad on 01.12.2025. 7. On basis of criminal complaint lodged by Ramlal, Giriraj, Motilal and Karan about transfer of property on basis of forged power of attorney executed on 10.09.2007, the matter is investigated after registration of FIR No.669/2024 at PS Udhyag Nagar (Kota City). After investigation, police filed a charge-sheet against Latur Lal, Hemraj, Mahaveer but kept pending against Banwari Sharma, Jeetu, Vikram, Bhagwan Singh, Uchavlal and Hari Narayan Soni. 8. Having taken note of the act committed by the petitioner and his role and involvement, I am of considered view that the petitioner is responsible for the entire act and he is not [2026:RJ-JP:2317] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-816/2026] entitled to be released on bail on the ground that offence is triable by Magistrate, First Class. 9. Considering the gravity of allegations and overall facts and circumstances of the case, it is appropriate to dismiss the bail application of the applicant accused at this stage. 10. Accordingly, the application for bail filed under Section 483 of BNSS preferred by Hemraj Suman S/o Dhannalal is hereby dismissed. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /03