1 2026:CGHC:2873 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 465 of 2026 1 - Rajesh Kumar Tiwari S/o Ram Khelawan Tiwari Aged About 48 Years Presently Working As Lecturer (L.B.) - Physics, In Government Higher Secondary School, Sarwani, Block - Bilha, District - Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Petitioner Versus 1 - The State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, District - Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - The Directorate Of Public Instruction Department Of School Education, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, District - Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Joint Director School Education School Education Department, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 4 - The District Education Officer Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 5 - The Principal Government Higher Secondary School, Sarwani, Block - Bilha, District - Bilaspur (C.G.) 6 - Ghanshyam Dewangan Presently Working As Lecturer (L.B.) Physics In Government Higher Secondary School, Sarwani, Block - Bilha, District - Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Sushil Dubey, Advocate For Respondents/State : Mr. Aditya Tiwari, Panel Lawyer SB: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge ORDER ON BOARD 2 16 /01/2026 1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs:- “10.1 That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire records pertaining to the case of the petitioner. 10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ in nature of mandamus whereby to set aside/quash the impugned order dated 31.10.2025 issued by Respondent District Education Officer, Bilaspur (ANNEXURE P/1) as well as relieving order dated 03.11.2025 issued by the Respondent Principal Government Higher Secondary School Sarwani,Block - Bilha, District - Bilaspur (C.G.) (ANNEXURE P/2) in the interest of justice. 10.3 Any other relief/reliefs, which this Hon'ble Court may think fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, with cost of the petition, may also please be granted to the petitioners.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this writ petition at this stage. 3. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 4. Certified copy as per rules. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Dey SHUBHAM DEY Digitally signed by SHUBHAM DEY Date: 2026.01.20 11:01:48 +0530