Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15639 (ALL)

VIPUL KUMAR SHARMA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

WRIB/3521/2026 · 2026-10-06

Ashutosh Srivastava

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 3521 of 2026 Court No. - 50 HON'BLE ASHUTOSH SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. The limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner is for issuance of a writ of mandamus commanding the respondent no. 2 i.e. Settlement Officer of Consolidation Bijnor, District Bijnor, to decide the delay condonation application, question of maintainability of the appeal and the Appeal itself bearing Appeal No. 93/2026 (Deepak and others vs. Khurram Ali and others), under Section 11(1) of UPCH Act, pending before him, within the time frame fixed by this Court. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that application is pending consideration since long and the purpose of filing the present petition would stand served if appropriate directions are issued to the respondent No. 2 to consider and decide the aforesaid application and appeal. 4. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid proposition. 5. Considering the totality of the circumstances and submissions advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court is of the opinion that ends of justice would stand sub served if directions are issued for expeditious disposal of application and appeal. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed off with a direction to the respondent no. 2 i.e. Settlement Officer of Consolidation Bijnor, District Bijnor, to decide the delay condonation application, question of maintainability of the appeal and the Appeal itself bearing Appeal No. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Brajesh Shukla, Sushil Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Vipul Kumar Sharma .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) 93/2026 (Deepak and others vs. Khurram Ali and others), under Section 11(1) of UPCH Act, on merits, strictly in accordance with law, after affording due opportunity of hearing to all parties concerned expeditiously, preferably within a period of two months from the date of service of certified copy of the order of this Court. October 7, 2026 v.k. updh. WRIB No. 3521 of 2026 2 (Ashutosh Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- VINOD KUMAR UPADHYAY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad