CANARA BANK v. PREMKUMAR DEVANDAS KISHNANI AND ANR
WP/16151/2025 · 2026-10-07
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15638 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15638 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
69_WP_16151_25.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 16151 OF 2025 Canara Bank … Petitioner vs. Premkumar Devandas Kishnani (since deceased) Through legal heirs and another … Respondents Ms. Somesh Talla, i/b. Ms. Vaishali Bhilare for petitioner. Mr. Indrajeet Hingare for respondent No.2.
CORAM : MANISH PITALE & SHREERAM V. SHIRSAT, JJ DATE :
07th OCTOBER, 2026 P.C. : . The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner – bank (secured creditor) submits that the writ petition is rendered infructuous, for the reason that the subject matter of challenge was an order passed by the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT) in an application for waiver of pre-deposit. Subsequently, the petitioner withdrew the appeal itself in the DRAT.
2. In that light, the petitioner – bank desires to withdraw the writ petition.
3. In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
(SHREERAM V. SHIRSAT, J.) (MANISH PITALE, J.) 1/1 Priya Kambli PRIYA KAMBLI Digitally signed by PRIYA KAMBLI Date: 2026.10.07 15:00:49 +0530