Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15637 (KAR)

MR. V S VEERASAMI v. ENVIGREEN BIOTECH INDIA PVT LTD

CRL.P/7633/2020 · 2026-02-20

M G Uma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10726 CRL.P No. 7633 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE M G UMA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 7633 OF 2020 BETWEEN: 1. MR. V S VEERASAMI S/O SUBRAMANIAN AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.4, SREE RAM COLONY NANJUNDAPURAM ROAD, RAMANATHAPURAM COIMBATORE - 641 045 2. MRS. V KAVITHA RAJAN W/O RAJAN THANGAVEL AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS R/AT NO. 15/4, SREE RAM COLONY NANJUNDAPURAM ROAD, RAMANATHAPURAM COIMBATORE - 641 045 3. M/S GREEN TECH BIO PRODUCTS A PARTNERSHIP FIRM, REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNER V.S. VEERASAMI AND MRS. V. KAVITHA RAJAN HAVING OFFICE AT NO.4 SREE RAM COLONY NANJUNDAPURAM ROAD, Digitally signed by PRASHANTH N V Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10726 CRL.P No. 7633 of 2020 RAMANATHAPURAM COIMBATORE 641 045 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SHIVARAMU H.C., ADVOCATE - ABSENT) AND: 1. ENVIGREEN BIOTECH INDIA PVT LTD A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF COMPANIES ACT 2013 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR SHRI ASHWATH HEGDE S/O ARUNA HEGDE AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.1012, PLOT NO. 29 PRESTIGE MERIDIAN-1 M.G. ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001 …RESPONDENT THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.P.C. BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS HONBLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN C.C.NO.628/2020 PENDING BEFORE THE HONBLE 27TH A.C.M.M., AT BENGALURU. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE M G UMA - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10726 CRL.P No. 7633 of 2020 ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner is absent. No representation. 2. The petition is of the year 2020. This petition was listed on 16.06.2025 and on that date, the matter was adjourned by providing last chance for compliance of office objections. Thereafter, many times, it was listed before the Registry. In spite of that, the office objections are not complied with. Therefore, it is clear that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. 3. In view of dismissal of the petition, pending I.A. No.1/2020 does not survive for consideration. Accordingly, the same is disposed of. SD/- (M G UMA) JUDGE JS CT-SG