Research › Search › Judgment
High Court of Rajasthan · body
2026 DAILYLAW 15634 (RAJ)
SUNIL SON OF BRIJMOHAN SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
SOSA/115/2026 · 2026-02-10
Uma Shanker Vyas
Criminal Appealbody2026
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15634 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15634 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:6096] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Misc 2nd Suspension of Sentence Application No. 115/2026 In S.B. Criminal Appeal No.2260/2025
1. Sunil Son Of Brijmohan Singh, Residentof Amokhari, Post Dathroi, District Hathras, Police Station Hathras Junction, Uttar Pradesh (At Present Confined In District Jail, Jhunjhunu)
2. Dheeraj @ Mota Son Of Jaswant, Resident Of Untoli, Police Station Bahror, District Alwar (Raj.) (At Present Confined In District Jail, Jhunjhunu) ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajveer Singh Gurjar, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Ms. Manju Dave, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order 10/02/2026 izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k dh vksj ls /kkjk 430 ch-,u-,l-,l- ds varxZr izLrqr ;g f}rh; ltk LFkxu@tekur vkosnu ij nksuksa i{kksa dks lquk x;kA v/khuLFk fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds vkyksP; fu.kZ; ,oa i=koyh ij miyC/k dkuwuh o rF;kRed fLFkfr ij fopkj fd;k x;kA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k dk izFke ltk LFkxu vkosnu okfil fy;s tkus ds vk/kkj ij [kkfjt fd;k x;k FkkA fopkj.k U;k;ky; fof'k"V U;k;k/kh'k] Lokid vkS"kf/k ,oa eu%izHkkoh inkFkZ vf/kfu;e izdj.k ¼vij ls'ku U;k;k/kh'k la[;k 02½ [ksrM+h] ftyk&>qa>quwa }kjk ls'ku izdj.k la[;k 12@2021 esa ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukad 05-08-2025 ds ek/;e ls vfHk;qDrx.k dks /kkjk 8@20 Lokid vkS"kf/k ,oa
[2026:RJ-JP:6096] (2 of 3) [SOSA-115/2026] eu%izHkkoh inkFkZ vf/kfu;e] 1985 ds rgr nks"kfl) ?kksf"kr dj vf/kdre 10 o"kZ ds dBksj dkjkokl o vFkZn.M ls nafMr fd;k gSA fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k dk fuosnu gS fd vihykFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k funksZ"k gSa rFkk mUgsa izdj.k esa feF;k :i ls fyIr fd;k x;k gS] os yEcs le; ls vfHkj{kk esa gksdj djhc vk/kh ltk Hkqxr pqds gSaA fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k }kjk ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;y; dk fu.kZ; Saudan Singh Vs.
The State of Uttar Pradesh Criminal Appeal No. 308/2022 is'k fd;kA nks"kfl)h gsrq i;kZIr lkexzh i=koyh ij ugha jgh gSA vihy esa lQy gksus dh iw.kZ laHkkouk gS] fdUrq vihy ds fuLrkj.k esa le; yxsxk] vUr esa ltk LFkfxr fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us ltk LFkxu vkosnu [kkfjt fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA lquk x;k ,oa leLr rF;ksa ij fopkj fd;k x;kA izdj.k ds rF;ksa o ifjfLFkfr;ksa] fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k }kjk ltk LFkxu izkFkZuk i= ds leFkZu esa U;k;ky; ds le{k izLrqr fd;s x;s rdksZa] izLrqr vihy esa mBk;s x;s dkuwuh eqn~nksa vkfn dks /;ku esa j[krs gq,] xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk] ;g ltk LFkxu izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA ifj.kker% ;g f}rh; ltk LFkxu izkFkZuk i= izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k 1- lqfuy iq= c`teksgu flg o 2- /khjt mQZ eksVk iq= tloar dh vksj ls fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk vf/kjksfir lEiw.kZ vFkZn.M dh jkf'k fopkj.k U;k;ky; esa tek djk;s tkus dh iwoZorhZ 'krZ ij Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gS vkSj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd ;fn bl U;k;ky; esa fnukad 12-03-2026 dks ,oa rRi'pkr tc Hkh mUgsa vknsf'kr fd;k tkos] viuh mifLFkfr gsrq izR;sd }kjk ,d yk[k :i;s dk ca/ki= ,oa ipkl&ipkl gtkj :i;s dh nks tekursa fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn izLrqr dj rLnhd djok
[2026:RJ-JP:6096] (3 of 3) [SOSA-115/2026] nsa rks mUgsa tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tkos ,oa fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds }kjk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k ds laca/k esa ikfjr vk{ksfir fu.kZ; fnukafdr 05-08-2025 ds rgr dkjkokl ds laca/k esa fn;s x;s n.Mkns'k dk fdz;kUo;u bl vihy ds vfUre fu.kZ; gksus rd LFkfxr j[kk tkosA (UMA SHANKER VYAS),J DINESH KUMAWAT /01