Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15633 (GAU)

SIMA SHARMA AND ANR v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS

WP(C)/581/2024 · 2026-10-06

Kardak Ete

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010017002024 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/581/2024 SIMA SHARMA AND ANR W/O LATE RINKU SHARMA R/O JONAKI NAGAR, P.O. AND P.S. GOLAGHAT DIST. GOLAGHAT, ASSAM, PIN-785621 2: SRI ANSUMAN SHARMA S/O LATE RINKU SHARMA REPRESENTED BY THE NATURAL GUARDIAN SMTI. SIMA SHARMA I.E. MOTHER R/O JONAKI NAGAR P.O. AND P.S. GOLAGHAT DIST. GOLAGHAT PIN-785621 ASSA VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING AND NH DEPARTMENT, BLOCK-B, GROUND FLOOR, ASSAM SECRETARIAT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-781006 2:THE CHIEF ENGINEER PWD (NH WORKS) CHANDMARI ASSAM GUWAHATI-781003 Page No.# 2/3 3:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PWD GOLAGHAT NH DIVISION DIST. GOLAGHAT ASSAM PIN-785621 4:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER GOLAGHAT DIST. GOLAGHAT ASSAM PIN-785621 5:THE SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER (CIVIL) DHANSIRI SARUPATHER DIST. GOLAGHAT ASSAM PIN-785601 6:THE PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT GENERAL (A AND E) MAIDAMGAON BELTOLA GUWAHATI-781029 7:SMTI. BINA MONI DEVI W/O LATE RINKU SHARMA R/O VILL- NO. 1 GONDHAKOROI GAON P.O. GOHAINGAON P.S. SARUPATHAR DIST. GOLAGHAT ASSAM PIN-78560 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. ABU JAHID, MR. D SARMA Advocate for the Respondent : SC, PWD (NH), MR. S K MEDHI (SC,AG (A AND E)),MR R ISLAM (LEGAL AID COUNSEL FOR R-7),MS P SARMA (r-7),K U AHMED (r-7),GA, ASSAM,SC, AG Page No.# 3/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE ORDER Date : 07.10.2026 None appears for the petitioners on call. Ms. Toshisenla, learned counsel appears on behalf of Mr. R. Dhar, learned Standing counsel, PWD for respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3, Mr. P. Saikia, learned State counsel for respondent Nos. 4 and 5, Mr. S.K. Medhi, learned Standing counsel, Accountant General for respondent No.6 and Mr. R. Islam, learned counsel for respondent No.7 are present. The petitioner appears to be no longer interested to pursue the matter. Accordingly, this writ petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution. Needless to observe that the interim order shall be merged along with this order. JUDGE Comparing Assistant