Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15630 (RAJ)

RABIYA NAZ D/O SHRI ANSAR AHMED, W/O SH. PRABHAKAR BENIWAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLW/64/2026 · 2026-01-30

Anil Kumar Upman

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:4475] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 64/2026 1. Rabiya Naz D/o Shri Ansar Ahmed, W/o Sh. Prabhakar Beniwal, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Gadiyo Ka Adda, Kafla Bazar, Police Station Kotwali Tonk, District Tonk, Raj. At Presently R/o Doulatpura, Dhanna Talai Tonk, Police Station Purana Tonk, District Tonk, Rajasthan. 2. Prabhakar Beniwal, S/o Shri Pradep Kumar Berwa, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Doulatpura, Dhanna Talai Tonk, Police Station Purana Tonk, District Tonk, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. 2. The Superintendent Of Police, District Tonk, Rajasthan 3. The SHO Police Station Kothwali Tonk, District Tonk, Rajasthan. 4. The SHO Police Station Purana Tonk, District Tonk, Rajasthan. 5. Ansari Ahmemd S/o Sh. Ahmad Ali, R/o Gadiyo Ka Adda, Kafla Bazar, Police Station Kotwali Tonk, District Tonk, Raj. 6. Attar Miya S/o Sh. Ahmad Ali, R/o Gadiyo Ka Adda, Kafla Bazar, Police Station Kotwali Tonk, District Tonk, Raj. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. S.N. Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rishiraj Singh Rathore, PP with Mr. Gaurav Gupta, Asst. G.A. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 30/01/2026 1. Defects pointed out by the Registry are overruled. 2. Petitioners are major and present in person. They have duly been identified by their counsel. 3. This criminal writ petition has been filed by petitioners seeking protection from the private respondent Nos.5 & 6 as they are apprehending danger to their life and liberty at the hands of private respondents. [2026:RJ-JP:4475] (2 of 2) [CRLW-64/2026] 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the petitioners are mature enough to take decision of their life. It is submitted that petitioners have entered into marriage as per Hindu Rites and Customs at Arya Samaj Mandir Vedic Sanskar Trust, Delhi on 07.01.2026. Counsel further submits that petitioners are living peacefully as husband and wife but respondent Nos.5 & 6 are not happy with their marriage and petitioners are receiving continuous threats from the private respondents, so they prayed for protection. 5. In view of the above factual averments, petitioners are directed to file appropriate application seeking protection before respondent No.4-Station House Officer, Police Station Purana Tonk, District Tonk, Rajasthan and respondent no.4 is directed to provide protection to the petitioners, if any application is filed before him and he would ensure that no harm is caused to the petitioners. 6. The criminal writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. 7. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. 8. However, it is made clear that this order will not affect the civil/ criminal proceedings, if any, in the present matter. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /342