Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15629 (RAJ)

JAI SINGH MEENA S/O SHRI RAM SWAROOP MEENA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/844/2026 · 2026-01-29

Sameer Jain

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:4116] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 844/2026 Jai Singh Meena S/o Shri Ram Swaroop Meena, Aged About 50 Years, Principal- Pm Shree Government Senior Secondary School- Shyampur, Block Mandrial, District Karauli And Resident Of House No. 38, Milan Nagar, Near Mds University, Ghooghra, Ajmer. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary To The Government, Department Of Education (Group-2), Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Director, Department Of Secondary Education, Directorate- Rajasthan, Bikaner. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashish Kishore Saksena For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vishal Kumar for Mr. Manoj Sharma, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 29/01/2026 1. The present petition is filed with the following prayers: "(i) An appropriate writ, order or directions to the respondent No.1, the Appellate Authority, for disposal of the appeal filed by the petitioner under Rule 23 of the Rules of 1958 as on 27.02.2025 (Annex-4) within a specific time frame, not beyond a period of 03 months from the date of order, with all consequential relief. (ii) An appropriate writ, order or direction to the respondents quashing any adverse order if made during pendency of the writ petition. (iii) Any other appropriate writ, order or direction to the respondents, which this hon'ble court deems just, and proper in the circumstances of the case. (iv) Cost of the writ petition." [2026:RJ-JP:4116] (2 of 2) [CW-844/2026] 2. As on directions of the Court Mr. Vishal Kumar appearing for Mr. Manoj Sharma, AAG has marked presence qua the respondents, notices need not be issued. 3. Taking note of the consensus drawn inter-se the parties and upon a perusal of the material available on record vis-a-vis the limited prayers made by the counsel for the petitioner, this Court directs that the appeal preferred by the petitioner before the respondent no.1 shall be considered within an upper limit of three months, from the date of passing of this order. 4. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed. (SAMEER JAIN),J JKP/74