Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:9998-DB WA No. 1893 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH WRIT APPEAL NO. 1893 OF 2025 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN:
1.
THE TAHASILDAR, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK, BENGALURU-560009 …APPELLANT (BY SRI. SUDEV HEGDE.M.N, AGA)
AND:
1. RAMESH S/O. LATE SANJEEVAPPA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/AT NO. 12/11, 1ST MAIN ROAD, VIJAYANAGARA, BANGALORE-560040. …RESPONDENT
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS IN THE WRIT PETITION AND SET ASIDE THE FINAL IMPUGNED
ORDER DATED 30.09.2024 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE OF THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT IN WRIT PETITION No.
25210/2023, ETC.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH
Digitally signed by VASANTHA KUMARY B K Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:9998-DB WA No. 1893 of 2025
ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH)
The present intra Court appeal has been filed impugning the judgment and order dated 30.09.2024 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.No.25210/2023.
2. The writ appeal is delayed by 390 days. The reasons explained for condoning the delay are neither satisfactory nor convincing.
3. As we do not find that there is sufficient cause or reason to condone the delay, we reject the application (I.A.No.1/2025) seeking condonation. Resultantly, the appeal stands dismissed.
Sd/- (D K SINGH) JUDGE
Sd/- (S RACHAIAH) JUDGE
RKA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6