ANOWAR HOSSAIN @ ANOWAR MONDAL v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL
CRM (A)/278/2026 · 2026-02-11
Jay Sengupta
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1562 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1562 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
11.02.2026 Court No.28 Item No.46 ssi CRM (A) 278 of 2026
In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Suraksha Nagarik Sanhita in connection with Domkal Police Station Case No. 333 of 2025 dated 24.04.2025 under Sections 21 ( c)/29 of the NDPS Act. And In the matter of: Anowar Hossain @ Anowar Mondal …. Petitioner
Mr. Anit Dey …for the petitioner
Mr. Soumik Ganguly Mr. Sachit Talukdar
..for the State
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that there is no other material available against the petitioner except for the statements of the co-accused.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State strongly opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. He submits that the petitioner is the owner of the house from where the contraband was seized. He relies on the statements of local witnesses as well as the seizure list.
Considering the above and the other incriminating materials available in the case diary and the restriction contained in Section 37 of the NDPS Act, I do not consider that this is to be a fit case for granting anticipatory bail.
Accordingly, the application for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is rejected.
(Jay Sengupta, J.)