1. Constitution of India for issuance of direction to respondent Nos. to protect life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands respondents, as they have attained majority and married against the wishes of their family members. 2. the Superintendent of Police, Kaithal, look into the representation dated him by them and take appropriate action on the same. 3. and their dates of birth are copies of their respectively. They got married is enclosed with the petition as Annexure P 4. The present petition has been filed under Constitution of India for issuance of direction to respondent Nos. to protect life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands respondents, as they have attained majority and married against the wishes of their family members. Learned counsel states that the petitioners will be satisfied if Superintendent of Police, Kaithal, i.e. respondent No. look into the representation dated 17.03.2026 him by them and take appropriate action on the same. As per the averments made, both the petitioners are major and their dates of birth are 03.08.2000 and 10.07.2003 copies of their Aadhar cards are appended as Annexures P respectively. They got married on 17.03.2026 is enclosed with the petition as Annexure P- Notice of motion. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of direction to respondent Nos.2 and 3 to protect life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of private respondents, as they have attained majority and married against the Learned counsel states that the petitioners will be satisfied if i.e. respondent No.2 is directed to 17.03.2026 (Annexure P-5), made to him by them and take appropriate action on the same. As per the averments made, both the petitioners are major 03.08.2000 and 10.07.2003, respectively. The cards are appended as Annexures P-1 and P-2, 17.03.2026 and the Marriage Certificate -4. PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.03.18 18:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. 5. At the asking of the Court, accepts notice on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 3 and has no objection in deciding the representation filed on behalf of the petitioners. 6. In view of the limited prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioners and without going into the merits of their claim, this petition is disposed of with direction to respondent No.2 to look into the representation dated 17.03.2026 (Annexure P-5) and decide the same expeditiously, in accordance with law. 7. It is however, made clear that this order shall not preclude the authorities to proceed against the petitioners, in case, they are found involved in any other criminal proceedings, instituted/pending against them if there is some evidence that surfaces regarding their involvement in a cognizable offence, for which they may be required by the investigating agency. PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.03.18 18:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.