IN TH 106 Nasib Sing Anurag Ra CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU proceeding the interim ordinate Be while issui alongwith restrained f to the impu 21 and P- order dated COCP No. COCP-1742-2026 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR COCP No.1742 o Date of decision b Singh and others Versus Rastogi, Chief Secretary, Haryan AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI Mr. Ranjit Singh Kalra, Advoc for the petitioners. Mr. Chirag Wadhwa, DAG, H HI GUPTA J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petiti eedings be initiated against the respon nterim order dated 19.1.2026 (Annex ate Bench of this Court in CWP No. e issuing notice of motion, the matte with CWP-23822-2024 and mean ained from taking any action regarding e impugned orders, dated 10.9.2024 an -27) respectively. Learned counsel for the resp r dated 21.5.2025 passed by co-ordin P No.1789 of 2025 titled as “Ramka 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH 1742 of 2026 (O & M) cision :-20.04.2026 …..Petitioners aryana and others …..Respondents E NIDHI GUPTA Advocate AG, Haryana. petitioner submits that contempt respondent(s) for not complying (Annexure P-1) passed by a co- No.1018 of 2026, vide which, matter was ordered to be heard meanwhile respondents were arding refixation of pay pursuant 024 and 24.9.2024 (Annexures P- e respondent-State refers to the ordinate Bench of this Court in Ramkaran and others vs. Anurag VIJAY ASIJA 2026.04.24 18.01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Rastogi an statement m “….the pet revision ca the date th the same w 4971-2025 be released submitted t month in construed a writ petitio of the sa compliance does not pr contempt p with by the April 20, 2 Vijay Asija Whether spea Whether Repo COCP-1742-2026 (O & M) ogi and others” whereby the petition ment made by learned counsel for t e petitioner soule be paid the revis n carried out in pursuance of the o te the stay was granted in the prese e would be done subject to the furt 025. It is submitted that the arrears ased within a period of three weeks ted that the release of the said amo in pursuance of the orders dated ued as an estoppels against the resp tition.” Learned counsel for the Sta he said order dated 21.5.2025, r liance would be made within three we In view of the above, learned not press the present petition any furth Dismissed as not pressed. Liberty is granted to the empt petition in case the abovesaid u by the respondents. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, , 2026 r speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No 2 petition was disposed of on the l for the State to the effect that evised pension in terms of the the order dated 03.8.2023 from present case i.e. 21.2.2025 and further orders passed in CWP- rears on the said account would eeks from today. It is however amount and the payment every ated 03.8.2023 should not be respondents from opposing the the State undertakes that in terms 25, referred above, necessary ree weeks from today. arned counsel for the petitioners y further. the petitioners to revive the said undertaking is not complied if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.04.24 18.01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document