IN TH (202) Sukhdev Sin Harnek Sing CORAM : Present:- RAMESH C 1. showing tha Singh have e 2. shows that th Rs.500/-. 3. to have expir the present p 12.03.2026 Sailesh IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR ev Singh Versus Singh & another M : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RA None for the petitioner None for respondent No.1. Mr.Akhil Kamra, AAG, Punjab ESH CHANDER DIMRI, J. (Oral) Shri Akhil Kamra, AAG, Punj ng that the petitioner Sukhdev Singh have expired. Trial Court record is available that the petitioner Sukhdev Singh had In view thereof, since the petit e expired on 17.10.2012 and had alrea esent petition stands abated. It is accord 2026 (RAM Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether Reportable : UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH CRR-429-2008 Decided on: 12.03.2026 ……Petitioner ..…Respondents RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI unjab, for respondent No.2. ral) : , Punjab has filed some documents Singh and respondent No.1 Harnek ilable in physical form. Its perusal gh had deposited the imposed fine of e petitioner Sukhdev Singh is stated already deposited the imposed fine, accordingly disposed of. RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI) JUDGE Yes No s rnek rusal e of tated , SAILESH RANJAN 2026.03.13 10:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document bottom left