[2026:RJ-JP:1757] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 751/2026 1. Anil Manju S/o Rakesh Manju, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Ward No. 22, Road No. 3, Jhunjhunu, Police Station Kotwali, Jhunhunu, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.) 2. Neelam Manju D/o Rakesh Manju, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Ward No. 22, Road No. 3, Jhunjhunu, Police Station Kotwali, Jhunjhunu, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.). ----Petitioners Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mahendra Singh Gurjar For Respondent(s) : Mr. A.K. Gupta, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 15/01/2026 1. Accused petitioners have filed this bail application under Section 482 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 354/2025, registered with the Police Station Kotwali Jhunjhunu, District Jhunjhunu for the offences u/S 115(2), 126(2), 331(2) & 326(f) of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the accused petitioners submits that the allegation against the accused petitioners are that they alongwith other co-accused, inflicted injuries to the complainant- Rajiv Manju. He also submitted that the accused petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case and all the injuries sustained by the complainant are opined to be simple in nature and the accused petitioners are not required for any kind of recovery. [2026:RJ-JP:1757] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-751/2026] 3. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the bail application. 4. The coordinate Bench, while enlarging the accused petitioner Rakesh Kumar Manju on bail, vide order dated 24.11.2025 in CRLMB No. 14581/2025 filed u/S 483 BNSS, has observed as under:- "4. Upon perusal of the order dated 11.11.2025 passed by this Court, it has been observed that the concerned Medical Jurist and the Investigating Officer was directed to remain present before this Court as the Injury Report qua the victim-complainant was indecipherable. On account of the same, the concerned Medical Jurist and the Investigating Officer have marked their presence before the Court and it has been submitted by the concerned Medical Jurist that all the injuries sustained by the victim-complainant are simple in nature." 5. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case so also the allegations against the accused petitioners and more particularly the fact that all the injuries sustained by the complainant are found to be simple in nature, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to extend the benefit of anticipatory bail to the accused petitioners. 6. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed. The S.H.O./I.O./Arresting Authority, Police Station Kotwali Jhunjhunu, District Jhunjhunu in FIR No. 354/2025 is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioners each of them shall be released on bail, provided each of them furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in [2026:RJ-JP:1757] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-751/2026] the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to his satisfaction on the following conditions:- (i) that the petitioners shall make themselves available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or any police officer, and (iii) that the petitioners shall not leave India without prior permission of the Court. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Gaurav Srivastava /321-S