Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15607 (RAJ)

ANIRUDDH S/O SHRI SAHAB SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/662/2026 · 2026-01-24

Praveer Bhatnagar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:3406] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 662/2026 Aniruddh S/o Shri Sahab Singh, R/o Bada Gaon, Police Station Mania, District Dholpur (At Present Confined In District Jail Dholpur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Brother of the petitioner is present in person For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar, PP Mr. Manvendra Singh, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 24/01/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. on behalf of accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.532/2025, registered at Police Station Kotwali Dholpur, District Dholpur, for the offence(s) under Sections 420, 419 and 120-B of IPC and under Section 3/10 of the Rajasthan Public Examination (Measures for Prevention of Unfair Means in Recruitment) Act, 2022. 2. Mr. Jayveer, brother of the petitioner is present in person. The learned Advocates are not appearing before the Court today. The brother of the petitioner has submitted a copy of his Aadhaar Card, which were duly verified with the original. It is contended by the petitioner's brother that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. The accused-petitioner is in [2026:RJ-JP:3406] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-662/2026] custody since long, the charge-sheet has already been submitted and the trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 4. Heard and perused the material available on the record. 5. Considering the fact that the charge-sheet has already been submitted, there are no criminal antecedents against the accused- petitioner, the accused-petitioner is in custody since long and the trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, without expressing anything on the merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner- Aniruddh S/o Shri Sahab Singh, in connection withFIR No.532/2025, registered at Police Station Kotwali Dholpur, District Dholpur, shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the Court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Ashwani Kr Srivastava /-139