MRITUNJAY GOSWAMI@ MRITUNJAY GOSWAMI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./4739/2026 · 2026-06-02
Rongon Mukhopadhyay
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15601 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15601 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:16006 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B. A. No. 4739 of 2026
--- Mritunjay Goswami @ Mritunjay Goshwami
… … Petitioner(s)
Versus The State of Jharkhand
… … Opposite Party(s)
---
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY
---
For the Petitioner(s)
: Mr. Lalit Yadav, Advocate
For the Opposite Party(s) : A.P.P.
---
2/02.06.2026 Heard Mr. Lalit Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner is an accused in connection with Chitra P.S. Case No. 22 of 2026.
It has been alleged that the petitioner had assaulted the wife of the informant and had stolen silver articles.
Submission has been advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner that there was a dispute with respect to a passage which led to the incident. It has been submitted that the petitioner does not have any criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 29.04.2026.
Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and has submitted that the wife of the informant had received several injuries on her head.
However, regard being had to the pre-cursor to the incident which was with respect to a dispute regarding a passage, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Madhupur in connection with Chitra P.S. Case No. 22 of 2026, subject to the condition that he shall remain physically present before the trial court on each and every date till the conclusion of trial, unless prevented by sufficient cause.
(Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J) 02.06.2026 Suman/Nandini/-