CHAUSON EDUCATION SOCIETY v. NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER
WA/409/2026 · 2026-02-09
C M Poonacha
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1560 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1560 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:7558-DB WA No. 409 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA WRIT APPEAL NO. 409 OF 2026 (EDN-REGP) BETWEEN:
1.
CHAUSON EDUCATION SOCIETY (SOCIETY REGISTERED UNDER THE SOCIETY REGISTRATION ACT 1960) HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO. 14,MLA LAYOUT RMV II STAG 4TH BLOCK NEW BEL ROAD BANGALORE -560094 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY SMT SHAKUNTALA CHUGULE AGED ABOUT 83 YEARS R/AT NO. 14, M L A LAYOUT RMV II STAGE, 4TH BLOCK, NEW BEL ROAD BANGALORE -560094
2.
CHAUSON COLLEGE OF EDUCATION AN INSTITUTION OF CHAUSON EDUCATION SOCIETY CHAUGULE HILLS CHIKODI-NIPANI ROAD CHIKKODI,BELAGAVI DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT MR SURENDRANATH CHAUGULE AGD ABOUT 64 YEARS R/AT NO. 14 M L A LAYOUT
Digitally signed by NIRMALA DEVI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:7558-DB WA No. 409 of 2026
RMV II STAGE 4TH BLOCK NEW BEL ROAD, BANGALORE -560094 …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. SAGAR B B, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION REPRESENTED BY REGIONAL DIRECTOR SOUTHERN REGIONAL COMMITTEE OFFICE G-7 SECTOR 10 (NEAR SECTOR-10 METRO STATION) DWARAKA NEW DELHI -110075
2.
RANICHANANAMMA UNIVERSITY REPRESENTED BY THE REGISTRAR OFFICE-VIDYASANGAMA POONA-BENGALURU NATIONAL HIGH WAY BELAGAVI-591156 …RESPONDENTS
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED
ORDER DATED 21/01/2026 PASSED IN WP NO.1094/2022 AND CONSEQUENTLY ALLOW THE WRIT PETITION AS PRAYED FOR AND ETC.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:7558-DB WA No. 409 of 2026
ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE)
1. The appellants have filed the present appeal impugning an
order dated 25.01.2026 passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ petition No.1094 of 2022 (EDN-RES). The appellants had preferred the said petition impugning the show cause notice dated 03.11.2021 praying that the same be declared as null, void and ineffective. The appellants had also impugned a final show cause notice dated 25.09.2020. The learned Single Judge had disposed of the writ petition by reserving the right of the appellants to reply to the show cause notice within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of the copy of the order and in the meanwhile, the court
directed the respondents not to take any coercive steps against the appellants.
2. The learned counsel appearing for the appellants submits that the show cause notice had been issued earlier and the appellants had replied to the same. He submits that the respondents had not considered the earlier replies furnished by the appellants and had issued fresh show cause notice. He contended that this pattern was repeating periodically.
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:7558-DB WA No. 409 of 2026
3. In the event the appellants do not wish to reply to the said show cause notice, there is no compulsion for the appellants to do so. Since it is the appellants' contention that they had already responded to the allegations by furnishing their replies to the show cause notice issued earlier, we direct the respondents to consider the response furnished by the appellants to the earlier show cause notices as their response to the present show cause notice and take an appropriate decision, as the appellants do not wish to submit any further response other than what was submitted to the earlier show cause notices.
4. The respondents shall take a final decision with respect to the impugned show cause notices within a period of eight weeks from date.
5. Copy of this order be communicated to the respondents as well as the learned counsel who appeared for the respondents in the writ petition.
6. Meanwhile, the interim order passed by the learned Single Judge not to take any precipitate steps till the show cause notice is adjudicated shall continue to operate.
- 5 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:7558-DB WA No. 409 of 2026
7. The appeal is disposed of with the aforesaid observations.
8. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
Sd/- (VIBHU BAKHRU) CHIEF JUSTICE
Sd/- (C.M. POONACHA) JUDGE
Vmb List No.: 2 Sl No.: 12