LALUMIYA S/O. TURAB SAYYAD. v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE DIST COLLECTOR LATUR AND ORS.
CA/3970/2026 · 2026-07-02
Shri S G Chapalgaonkar
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1560 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1560 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1004 CA 3860 OF 2026+.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 1004 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3860 OF 2026 IN FAST/7925/2026 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3983 OF 2026
IN FAST/7995/2026 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3985 OF 2026
IN FAST/7981/2026 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3986 OF 2026
IN FAST/8004/2026 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3987 OF 2026
IN FAST/7990/2026 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3989 OF 2026
IN FAST/8006/2026 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3979 OF 2026
IN FAST/7993/2026 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3980 OF 2026
IN FAST/7998/2026 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3993 OF 2026
IN FAST/8000/2026 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3970 OF 2026
IN FAST/7984/2026 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3976 OF 2026
IN FAST/7979/2026 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3975 OF 2026 IN FAST/7975/2026 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3992 OF 2026
IN FAST/8009/2026 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3981 OF 2026
IN FAST/7974/2026 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3982 OF 2026 1/3 2026:BHC-AUG:26329
1004 CA 3860 OF 2026+.odt
IN FAST/7986/2026 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3990 OF 2026
IN FAST/8002/2026 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3991 OF 2026
IN FAST/8012/2026 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3971 OF 2026
IN FAST/7965/2026 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3973 OF 2026
IN FAST/7969/2026 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3974 OF 2026
IN FAST/7972/2026 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3977 OF 2026
IN FAST/7988/2026 TURAB S/O. DADAMIYA SAYYAD. VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH COLLECTOR LATUR AND ORS. ... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. G. K. Sontakke AGP for Respondent No. 1,2 : Mr. C. V. Bhadane ... CORAM : S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J. DATE : 02.07.2026 PER COURT : Heard learned advocate appearing for the respective parties.
2. Though the notice is served upon respondent no. 3, none appears.
3. The applicants seek to condone delay of 246 days caused in filing appeals against the judgment and award passed by the Reference Court.
4. Perused the reasons stated in the applications particularly in paragraph nos. 4 to 10. The delay has been properly explained. In the 2/3
1004 CA 3860 OF 2026+.odt result, the applications are allowed. Delay is condoned. Civil Applications are disposed of.
5. Appeals be registered after removal of the office objection.
( S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.)
mkd/- 3/3