[2026:RJ-JP:3083] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 238/2026 1. Sripat Son of Fodi Meena, Aged About 65 Years, 2. Lakkha Son of Sripat, 3. Vijay Singh Son of Sripat, 4. Lalu Son of Sripat, 5. Ramroop Son of Babu, 6. Kailashi Wife of Vijay Singh, All resident of Mongepura, Mandrail, Police Station Mandrail, District Karauli, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through PP 2. Mansingh Son Of Ananda, Aged About 66 Years, Resident Of Mongepura, Mandrail, Police Station Mandrail, District Karauli, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Arvind Sharma Ms. Mamta Agarwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia, PP Mr. Fateh Ram Meena & Mr. Akash Sharma, for complainant HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 22/01/2026 1. Parties are present in person and they have duly been identified by their respective counsel. 2. By way of this criminal misc. petition under Section 528 of BNSS, the accused-petitioners have approached this Court with a prayer to quash the FIR No.78/2024 registered at Police Station Mandrail, District Karauli for offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 341 & 308 of IPC. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that cross-cases have been registered between the parties. Counsel submits that [2026:RJ-JP:3083] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-238/2026] now, parties have settled their dispute amicably. It is submitted that due to compromise, further proceedings in the aforesaid FIR are fruitless. The written compromise has been annexed with this petition. 4. Learned counsel for the complainant does not dispute the factum of compromise. 5. In view of the aforesaid and considering the submissions made on behalf of the respective parties; the material made available for perusal; considering the fact that parties have resolved their dispute amicably and also finding that the present case is wholly covered by the principle of law laid down by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the case of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr-reported in 2012 Cr.L.J. (SC) 4934 and in the case of State of Haryana & Ors. Vs. Choudhary Bhajan Lal & Ors. [AIR 1992 SC 604] and as such, the aforesaid FIR is liable to be quashed in view of compromise arrived at between the parties. 6. In view of the above, this Criminal Misc. Petition is allowed and the FIR No.78/2024 registered at Police Station Mandrail, District Karauli is quashed and set aside. Consequence to follow. 7. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /142