PRITI SAGAR D/O. SHRI SUMER SINGH, W/O. SATYAVEER CHAHAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/587/2026 · 2026-01-16
Sameer Jain
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15593 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15593 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:1893] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 587/2026 Priti Sagar D/o. Shri Sumer Singh, W/o. Satyaveer Chahar, Aged About 49 Years, R/o. Village Kayasthpura, Post Bagar, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.) At Present Posted As Head Constable At Cid Intelligence Phq Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. The Director General Of Police, Rajasthan, Police Headquarter, Lalkothi, Jaipur.
3. The Superintendent Of Police (Information), Police Headquarter, Lalkothi, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Satya Pal Poshwal with Ms. Abhilasha Choudhary Ms. Seema Jherwal Ms. Bhanwari Kumari Mr. Harshit Mehta For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Order 16/01/2026
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that filing an appeal against the impugned order before the learned RCSAT is a compulsive mechanism, howsoever, the same is a time taking process and not an efficacious remedy.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the same is covered by the dicta encapsulated by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.11973/2012 titled Dara Singh Versus State & Ors. and in S.B. Civil Writ
[2026:RJ-JP:1893] (2 of 2) [CW-587/2026] Petition No.4599/2021 titled Shivkant Versus State of Rajasthan & Ors.
3. Considering that the matter at hand is a service matter; that the matter on the same lines had already been dealt with; that the petitioner has straight away approached to this Court bypassing the alternate remedy, and looking to the overall facts and circumstances, this Court directs the petitioner to avail the alternate remedy available, with the direction to the learned RCSAT to dispose of the instant matter, within an upper limit of 90 days of filing the appeal therein.
4. Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of. Pending applications, if any, shall also stand disposed.
(SAMEER JAIN),J DEEPAK/37