Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010216832026 2026:GAU-AS:14528 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/2437/2026 INAMUL ISLAM ALIAS INAMUL HOQUE S/O. ABDUL ODUD, VILL UDALIGAON, P.S LANKA, DIST. HOJAI, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY PP, ASSAM. Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. P RAHMAN, MR S ISLAM Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHAMIMA JAHAN ORDER 30.09.2026 1. Heard Mr. P. Rahman, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Ms. S.H. Borah, learned APP appearing for the State of Assam. 2. By this application, the petitioner has prayed for pre-arrest bail in connection with Lanka P.S. Case No. 213/2026 registered under Sections 309(6)/117(2)/351(2)/3(5) of the BNS, 2023. Page No.# 2/3 3. The FIR, in connection with which the petitioner apprehends arrest was lodged by the informant stating inter alia that while he was returning to his house from the residence of one of his friends the accused persons including the petitioner attacked him with rods, hockey sticks etc. The informant further stated that he sustained injuries in the said incident and that the accused persons also snatched some cash from him. He further stated that two of his friends were accompanying him who were also threatened by the petitioner and the other accused persons. 4. Ms. S.H. Borah, learned APP however opposes the grant of pre-arrest bail and submits that the case diary may be called for. 5. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have perused the materials available on record. It appears that the narration in the FIR does not disclose the complete facts of the occurrence and that there is no specific allegation against the petitioner in the FIR. 6. In view of the above, this Court is of the considered view that the petitioner may be granted the privilege of pre-arrest bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is hereby enlarged on pre-arrest bail on furnishing a bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand) with one local surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned SDJM, Titabar subject to the following conditions: (i) The petitioner shall positively appear before the Investigating Officer within a period of 15 days from today and corporate with the investigation without any failure, (ii) The petitioner shall not hamper and tamper with the evidence of the case, and/or influence the witness connected with the case; Page No.# 3/3 and (iii) The petitioner shall not leave his residence without prior permission of the Investigating Officer. 7. Accordingly, this Anticipatory Bail application is disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant