Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15591 (MAD)

P.LOKESH v. THE COMMISSIONER

WP/29091/2023 · 2026-04-06

K Surender, S M Subramaniam

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:MHC:1414 WP No. 29091 of 2023 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 06-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K. SURENDER WP No. 29091 of 2023 and WP No.28687 of 2023 P.Lokesh ..Petitioner Vs 1. The Commissioner, Poonamallee Panchayat Union, Poonamallee, Chennai 600 056. 2. The Assistant Block Development Officer, (Administration), Poonamallee Panchayat Union, Poonamallee, Chennai 600 056. 3. The Tahsildar, Poonamalee Taluk, Thiruvallur District. 4. The Member Secretary, Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority, Thalamuthu Natarajan Building, No.1, Gandhi Irwin Road, Egmore, Chennai 600 008. 5. V.Vignesh ..Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the Respondents 1 to 4 herein, from and in any manner creating a road/ access for the property owned by the 5th respondent in Survey No. 80 by connecting the same to the roads within the layout of SPE Mono City through the Private lands owned by the petitioner https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 29091 of 2023 __________ Page2 of 4 and his brother admeasuring Ac. 1.43 Cents comprised in Survey Nos. 35/3 Part, 78 Part, 79 Part, 116/2 Part, 117/2 Part , 119/3 Part , 119/1 Part, 34/4A and 4B of Pidarithangal Village. For Petitioner : Mr. N.Ramakrishnan for M/s. Ark Law Associates For Respondents : Mr.T.Arunkumar, Addl. Govt. Pleader for R1 to R3 Mrs.P.Veena Suresh, Standing Counsel for R4 Mr.P.Krishnan for R5 Order (Order of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam J.) The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that a civil suit has been filed. 2. The learned counsel for the 4th respondent would submit that the encroachment has already been removed. 3. Be that as it may, since a civil suit has already been filed, no further adjudication is required and the Writ Petition stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition stands closed. (S.M.S.,J.) (K.S.,J.) 06-04-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No DSA https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 29091 of 2023 __________ Page3 of 4 To 1. The Commissioner, Poonamallee Panchayat Union, Poonamallee, Chennai 600 056. 2. The Assistant Block Development Officer, (Administration), Poonamallee Panchayat Union, Poonamallee, Chennai 600 056. 3. The Tahsildar, Poonamalee Taluk, Thiruvallur District. 4. The Member Secretary, Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority, Thalamuthu Natarajan Building, No.1, Gandhi Irwin Road, Egmore, Chennai 600 008. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 29091 of 2023 __________ Page4 of 4 S.M.SUBRAMANIAM J. AND K.SURENDER J. DSA WP No. 29091 of 2023 06-04-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis