Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:2801] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 368/2026
1. Ghanshyam S/o Bhanwarlal, Aged About 55 Years, R/o Katsoora Thasil Kishangarh District Ajmer Rajasthan.
2. Soraj S/o Madana, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Katsoora Thasil Kishangarh District Ajmer Rajasthan.
3. Shaitan Prajapat S/o Mangalram, Aged About 32 Years, R/ o Katsoora Thasil Kishangarh District Ajmer Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor
2. Mangal S/o- Rameshwar Parjapat, Aged About 35 Years, R/o- Katsoora Thasil Kishangarh District Ajmer Rajasthan.
3. Hanuman S/o Rameshwar, Aged About 41 Years, R/o Kumharo Ka Mohalla, Katsoora Thasil Kishangarh District Ajmer Rajasthan.
4. Kaluram S/o Hanuman, Aged About 17 Years, Through Guardian Father Hanuman R/o Kumharo Ka Mohalla, Katsoora Thasil Kishangarh District Ajmer Rajasthan.
5. Rameshwar S/o Badri, Aged About 65 Years, R/o Kumharo Ka Mohalla, Katsoora Thasil Kishangarh Districr Ajmer Rajasthan.
6. Smt. Choti Devi W/o Ganesh, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Katsoora Thasil Kishangarh District Ajmer Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pradeep Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Choudhary, PP Mr. Mahesh Gurjar & Mr. Abhishek Dadhich, for complainants HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Order 21/01/2026
1. The instant misc. petition under Section 528 of BNSS has been filed for quashing of criminal proceedings pending before learned Additional Session Judge No.1, Kishangarh, Ajmer in Session Case No.99/2025 arising out of FIR No.80/2025
[2026:RJ-JP:2801] (2 of 3) [CRLMP-368/2026] registered at Police Station Arain, District Ajmer for offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 352, 351(2), 351(3) & 189(2) of BNS.
2. After registration of the aforesaid FIR, the police conducted investigation in the matter and submitted charge-sheet before the concerned court. Thereafter, charges were framed against the petitioners.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that parties have entered into a compromise in the spirit of lok adalat. It is submitted that there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioners. Learned counsel contends that except one grievous injury, all other injuries are simple in nature. It is submitted that during trial, both parties filed an application for attesting the compromise for offence under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 117(2), 352 BNS before learned trial court and vide order dated 18.12.2025, learned trial court verified the compromise for the aforesaid offences under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 352 & 117(2) of BNS and trial was kept pending for the offences punishable under Sections 109(1)/3(5) of BNS. Learned counsel contends that in cross case, proceedings have already been quashed by learned trial court on the basis of compromise. It is thus prayed that the proceedings may be quashed.
4. Learned State counsel and learned counsel for the complainants do not dispute the factum of compromise.
5. In view of the aforesaid and considering the submissions made on behalf of the respective parties; the material made available for my perusal; considering the fact that petitioners and
[2026:RJ-JP:2801] (3 of 3) [CRLMP-368/2026] complainants have arrived at compromise and settled their dispute and in the view of the law laid down by the Hon’ble Apex court in the case of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr-reported in 2012 Cr.L.J. (SC) 4934 and in the case of State of Haryana & Ors. Vs. Choudhary Bhajan Lal & Ors. [AIR 1992 SC 604], the criminal proceedings are liable to be quashed in view of compromise arrived at between the parties.
6. In view of the above, this Criminal Misc. Petition is allowed and the entire criminal proceedings pending before learned Additional Session Judge No.1, Kishangarh, Ajmer in Session Case No.99/2025, arising out of FIR No.80/2025 registered at Police Station Arain, District Ajmer, are quashed and set aside on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. Consequence to follow.
7. Stay Application and pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /251