6-RPW123-2026.DOC Santosh IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO. 123 OF 2026 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 11027 OF 2026 Abdulbari Gulam Hussain Tungekar And Ors ...Petitioners Versus The State Of Maharashtra And Ors …Respondents Mr. Pradeep Thorat, aw Bhalchandra Shinde, for the Petitioners. Mr. Y. D. Patil, AGP for the State. CORAM : N. J. JAMADAR, J. DATED : 6th OCTOBER, 2026 Oral Order:- 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioners. 2. This petition is filed seeking review of the order dated 28th August, 2026 passed by this Court in WP/11027/2026. 3. Upon hearing Mr. Thorat, on the substance of the matter, this Court does not find any error apparent on the face of the record or any other sufficient ground to review the said order. 4. Mr. Thorat, the learned Counsel for the petitioner, submits that the observations in paragraph 12 of the order with regard to the legal implications of a person being in cultivation of the 1/2 SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI Digitally signed by SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI Date: 2026.10.07 11:09:10 +0530 6-RPW123-2026.DOC agricultural land on the Tiller’s day, may have a bearing on the application filed on behalf of the petitioner seeking determination of the purchase price under Section 32G of the Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948. 5. In view of the aforesaid apprehension, the review petition stands disposed with clarification that the said proceeding under Section 32G shall be decided on its own merits and in accordance with law, without being influenced by the order passed by this Court in Writ Petition No. 11027 of 2026. [N. J. JAMADAR, J.] 2/2