Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15583 (MAD)

R.JEEVANANDHAN v. The District collector

WP/8815/2026 · 2026-03-12

Abdul Quddhose

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 8815 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 12-03-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE WP No. 8815 of 2026 1. R.Jeevanandhan S/O.D.Ravi Rep by his power Agent M.N.Rauf S/o.Noorudeen No.45/26 Balamurugan street Vyasarpadi, Chennai-600 039 Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District collector Chennai-600 001 2.The Tahsildar Velachery Taluk office Chennai Respondent(s) PRAYER Directing the 2nd respondent to issue computerized patta to the petitioner in respect of the property comprised in S.No.316/6(part) and 316/6D, TS No.8 block No.239 of Velachery village, Velachery Taluk, situated at Balakrishnan Nagar, Chennai District, measuring to an extent of 42 cents or 18,312 sq.ft by considering the petitioners representation dated 7.10.2025 For Petitioner(s): Mr.T.Thamil Selvan For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Arumugam Govt Advocate For Respondents ORDER This writ petition has been filed to direct the second respondent to issue computerised patta in favour of the petitioner for the property morefully https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 8815 of 2026 described in the prayer to this writ petition. 2. According to the petitioner, till date, the computerised patta has not been issued in favour of the petitioner despite the petitioner possessing a manual patta. In such circumstances, the petitioner had submitted a representation on 07.10.2025 to the respondents. Since the said representation has not been considered till date, this writ petition has been filed. 3. Mr. S.Arumugam, learned Government Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 4. No prejudice would be caused to the respondents if the petitioner’s representation as stated supra is considered on merits and in accordance with law after giving due consideration to the supporting documents filed by the petitioner within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. 5. This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner’s representation. 6. For the foregoing reasons, this Court directs the second respondent to pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law on the petitioner’s representation dated 07.10.2025, seeking for issuance of computerised patta in https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 8815 of 2026 favour of the petitioner for the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order after giving due consideration to the supporting documents filed by the petitioner. 7. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. No Costs. 12-03-2026 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No ab To 1.The District collector Chennai-600 001 2.The Tahsildar Velachery Taluk office Chennai https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 8815 of 2026 ABDUL QUDDHOSE J. ab WP No. 8815 of 2026 12-03-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis