Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15582 (RAJ)

SAJID KHAN S/O MOHAMMAD ALI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/779/2026 · 2026-01-28

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:3796] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 779/2026 1. Sajid Khan S/o Mohammad Ali, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Village Chawandi Khurd, Police Station Shekhpur Ahir, District Khairtal-Tijara, Rajasthan. (Currently In Sub Jail, Kishangarhbas). 2. Akib S/o Mahmood, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village Chawandi Khurd, Police Station Shekhpur Ahir, District Khairtal-Tijara, Rajasthan. (Currently In Sub Jail, Kishangarhbas). 3. Sakrulla S/o Ayub Kha, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Village Chawandi Khurd, Police Station Shekhpur Ahir, District Khairtal-Tijara, Rajasthan. (Currently In Sub Jail, Kishangarhbas). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Harendra Singh with Mr. Narsi Prasad Sharma For Respondent(s) For Complainant : : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP Mr. Sikander Singh HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 28/01/2026 1. The petitioners have preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.189/2025 registered at Police Station Shekhpur Ahir, District-Bhiwadi for offences under Sections 189(2), 115(2) and 126(2) of BNS. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that a cross FIR has been lodged by the petitioners side. He submits that a compromise has been arrived at between the [2026:RJ-JP:3796] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-779/2026] petitioners and the complainant. Petitioners are behind the bars since 14.12.2025. The trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners in further custody, hence, the bail application of the petitioners may be allowed. 4. Learned counsel for the complainant has acceded to the submissions advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioners and has stated that a compromise has been arrived at between the complainant and the petitioners. He has further stated that he has no objection to the grant of bail to the present petitioners. 5. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 6. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case, and without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners. 7. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioners-Sajid Khan S/o Mohammad Ali, Akib S/o Mahmood and Sakrulla S/o Ayub Kha shall be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/ each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for their appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/134